Eiger Fell
Well 600,000 cubic metres of rock fell on Thursday. A large cloud of dust was driven out through the Gletscherschlucht. There's still more to come, as this is about a fifth of the unstable rock.
What irritates me about all this is the generally absurdly stereotyped way the English-language press has reported this event. Fundamentally it should be about the tremendous drama and power of natural events, with the subtext of climate change. Instead we get the hackneyed cliche of the Eiger being "notorious" or "treacherous", based on some dim recollection of the deaths of climbers in the '30s. There may be a link, but one would never guess.
The Eiger is a high, but not especially high, alpine peak: it is not a 4000er. It was first climbed in 1858, by Charles Barrington and the guides Christian Almer and Peter Bohren. This route is described in the current guidebook as delicate and arduous, at risk from stone and icefall, and difficult to follow in cloud. In other words not an alpine classic. However, as a climbing destination the Eiger has two other obvious features: the North Face, and the long arete leading NE from the summit.
The Eiger North Face is special, because it springs straight from much lower mountains. In no other place in the Alps is there such a dramatic transition. There are other big faces, some higher, but these are in inner fastnesses behind large glaciers. The Eiger in contrast rises above woods of silver fir and hay meadows. The big walls of the Alps only became practicable to climbers after the First World War. Several factors played a role: new techniques (some of which arose from the bitter warfare in the Dolomites); a desire for new challenges; more climbers and much easier access (the first decade of the 20th Century saw the building of many mountain railways); and, lastly, but probably less important than is made out, fascist governments keen for propaganda coups. Either way in the mid-1930s several groups of Austrian and German climbers met assorted disasters in trying to climb the North Face, The Eiger's very accessibility meant that their deaths' were highly visible: exactly what the press likes. It was finally climbed in 1938 by a joint Austrian-German team, who took 4 days. It continued to take lives after the war, and still remains one of the harder alpine classics, with, probably under 300 ascensionists. So the Eiger's notoriety really stems from this period.
Treacherousness is another thing. The reason why the Eiger North Wall is climbed relatively rarely is that it is rarely in condition, and it presents lots of, what climbers call, objective dangers. These are: ice and snow avalanches, and rock fall. Combined with the steepness of the terrain and the width of the face, which make retreat onto easier ground difficult, the route is still regarded as difficult. However, the hardest difficulties from a technical perspective are only grade V. There are many harder climbs in the Alps, but not that many as unforgiving. Often safety is in speed: dangerous places can be climbed at the safest time of day; less time is spent in these places; less weight needs to be carried; and so on. The fastest ascent is about 4 hours 30 minutes.
The face is also covered with newer routes, several of which are harder than the original one. Whether this will continue really depends on one thing: will the mountain stick together. So at last, there is a link back to the rocks falling a couple of kilometres from the summit!
The Eiger is made from heavily contorted limestones from the Jurassic and early Cretaceous periods. These rocks form a thin band on the map, between the pre-alpine massifs and the inner core of the Bernese Oberland, which is made up of granites and metamorphic rocks. They are not particularly strong and are friable. Much of the Eiger has been held together by cold.
Well 600,000 cubic metres of rock fell on Thursday. A large cloud of dust was driven out through the Gletscherschlucht. There's still more to come, as this is about a fifth of the unstable rock.
What irritates me about all this is the generally absurdly stereotyped way the English-language press has reported this event. Fundamentally it should be about the tremendous drama and power of natural events, with the subtext of climate change. Instead we get the hackneyed cliche of the Eiger being "notorious" or "treacherous", based on some dim recollection of the deaths of climbers in the '30s. There may be a link, but one would never guess.
The Eiger is a high, but not especially high, alpine peak: it is not a 4000er. It was first climbed in 1858, by Charles Barrington and the guides Christian Almer and Peter Bohren. This route is described in the current guidebook as delicate and arduous, at risk from stone and icefall, and difficult to follow in cloud. In other words not an alpine classic. However, as a climbing destination the Eiger has two other obvious features: the North Face, and the long arete leading NE from the summit.
The Eiger North Face is special, because it springs straight from much lower mountains. In no other place in the Alps is there such a dramatic transition. There are other big faces, some higher, but these are in inner fastnesses behind large glaciers. The Eiger in contrast rises above woods of silver fir and hay meadows. The big walls of the Alps only became practicable to climbers after the First World War. Several factors played a role: new techniques (some of which arose from the bitter warfare in the Dolomites); a desire for new challenges; more climbers and much easier access (the first decade of the 20th Century saw the building of many mountain railways); and, lastly, but probably less important than is made out, fascist governments keen for propaganda coups. Either way in the mid-1930s several groups of Austrian and German climbers met assorted disasters in trying to climb the North Face, The Eiger's very accessibility meant that their deaths' were highly visible: exactly what the press likes. It was finally climbed in 1938 by a joint Austrian-German team, who took 4 days. It continued to take lives after the war, and still remains one of the harder alpine classics, with, probably under 300 ascensionists. So the Eiger's notoriety really stems from this period.
Treacherousness is another thing. The reason why the Eiger North Wall is climbed relatively rarely is that it is rarely in condition, and it presents lots of, what climbers call, objective dangers. These are: ice and snow avalanches, and rock fall. Combined with the steepness of the terrain and the width of the face, which make retreat onto easier ground difficult, the route is still regarded as difficult. However, the hardest difficulties from a technical perspective are only grade V. There are many harder climbs in the Alps, but not that many as unforgiving. Often safety is in speed: dangerous places can be climbed at the safest time of day; less time is spent in these places; less weight needs to be carried; and so on. The fastest ascent is about 4 hours 30 minutes.
The face is also covered with newer routes, several of which are harder than the original one. Whether this will continue really depends on one thing: will the mountain stick together. So at last, there is a link back to the rocks falling a couple of kilometres from the summit!
The Eiger is made from heavily contorted limestones from the Jurassic and early Cretaceous periods. These rocks form a thin band on the map, between the pre-alpine massifs and the inner core of the Bernese Oberland, which is made up of granites and metamorphic rocks. They are not particularly strong and are friable. Much of the Eiger has been held together by cold.




